For my mum

"Its about thinking about things in terms of groups, sensible logical groups
of 'stuff' that do similar things and that you think of in a similar way.
You then build and manage things around these groups, its like having
business departments but with IT systems."

For a sixty year old with no clue about computers

"Like planning a cricket match, you've got all the different positions and
you've got to keep moving them around to get the best result, so some of
your services are your Andrew Flintoffs that can do loads of things, others
are like your Don Bradman and brilliant at one thing, some are good fielders
and some are good in the slips.  Players are services and the positions is
you configuring them to do what you want".

Booze Free in Southern France?  Aren't there laws against that?

On 26/11/06, Gervas Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  Thank you, Ashley. Your cultural level is far too rarefied for a Brit
in IT :). This adaptation of yours is more of what a suit would
describe as a strapline.

Here's a thought on a booze-free (yes, life can be sad at times, even
in Southern France) Sunday afternoon: as well as a crisp technical
definition, can anyone come up with brief descriptions of SOA that
make sense respectively to:

(1) their mother, assuming for the exercise that she is not a
Professor of Computer Science;

(2) a clear-thinking business person of about sixty years old who does
not love to use a PC directly, i.e. tap away at the keyboeard.

Gervas

--- In 
[email protected]<service-orientated-architecture%40yahoogroups.com>,
"Ashley at
Metamaxim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What about: "That architecture, no better architecture than which
can be imagined"?
>
> (Adapted from Anselm of Canterbury).
>
> Rgds
> Ashley
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gervas Douglas
> To: 
[email protected]<service-orientated-architecture%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 2:30 PM
> Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Another Crack at
Defining SOA
>
>
> No one anywhere in the known universe has yet come up with a
> definition of SOA which commands widespread acceptance. Perhaps it is
> time we had another crack at it.
>
> Over to you ladies and gents...
>
> Gervas
>

Reply via email to