On Nov 27, 2006, at 8:49 AM, Jan Algermissen wrote:

Hi Stefan,

On Nov 26, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Stefan Tilkov wrote:

> In REST, a similar example is a fixed interface with standardized
> methods (e.g. GET for "safe" operations)

Just checking: you do agree that GET is GET (which happens to be
defined to be safe) and not a tunnel for arbitrary safe operations.

IOW, GET's application semantic is 'get me a representation of the
current state of the resource' and not 'perfom some safe operation foo
()'.


Yes, I do agree; I should have phrased that more clearly.

Stefan
--
Stefan Tilkov, http://www.innoq.com/blog/st/


Jan



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to