On Nov 27, 2006, at 12:36 AM, Vikas Deolaliker wrote:
Why is the definition important?The intent of SOA is quite well understood, IMHO, i.e. de- containerize business logic. If I write business logic that assumes a type of container and its services, I am not doing SOA.
I totally agree, but I know many people who claim they're J2EE-based components have been "SOA-compliant" for years. So not everybody does ...
Best regards, Stefan
The question of who enforces the business logic and who defines it is something that we may want to discuss on this forum.Vikas ----- Original Message ---- From: Gervas Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 6:30:55 AMSubject: [service-orientated-architecture] Another Crack at Defining SOANo one anywhere in the known universe has yet come up with a definition of SOA which commands widespread acceptance. Perhaps it is time we had another crack at it. Over to you ladies and gents... Gervas
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
