Andrew S. Townley wrote: > In any event, > doing something useful with that message is going to mean writing code > anway, but it'll be code that's not tied to a particular remote object > interface, only the messages and the business-level exchange protocol of > the service.
Knowledge of a particular remote object interface is exactly equal to the knowledge of the messages, their structure and the business-level exchange. This is the standing argument I have with the REST proponents suggesting that somehow REST has less cohesion or binding of the application to the service. I don't see how there is a difference here. Maybe I'm missing something... Gregg Wonderly
