On 12/12/06, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Steve Jones wrote: > > Personally I think REST should mandate sensible names with resource > > IDs being GUIDs that makes perfect sense to me and would clear up all > > the confusion. > > I disagree. Naming conventions and architectural constraints are > separate concerns.
So what is the implementation of REST called? I'm really struggling to understand why REST people dislike having decent names for URIs. > >
