<<In these embryonic days of service-oriented architecture, the 
notion of what will ultimately constitute "enterprise-grade" is still 
in flux, as is the role of the Java platform and, more specifically, 
Java EE 5.
                                
During this transitional period from what enterprise Java was to what 
building an enterprise-grade SOA—with or without Java—will be, the 
Java ecosystem players are exploring the possibilities and many are 
putting their eggs in more than one basket.

Bruce Snyder, co-founder and developer for the Geronimo project and a 
senior architect at LogicBlaze Inc., an open source SOA provider, 
said "enterprise-grade" means different things to different 
organizations, but that building an SOA should not require a 
"forklift upgrade."

"Enterprise-grade is something that scales to support your business," 
Snyder said. "An enterprise-grade grade SOA should be flexible enough 
to do what you need it to do, but SOA shouldn't be a great big 
forklift change or an upgrade to another piece of software like EAI 
[enterprise application integration] was. It's about biting off as 
much as you can chew and doing as much as you want. There are 
solutions out there that are forklift upgrades, they require a 
substantial financial investment in software and require you to 
change way you develop. That's quite a lot to swallow."

Snyder said enterprise-grade SOA should have flexibility on the back 
end as well as on the developer side, and by that he means making it 
easier to do things. "There's a portion of Java EE trying to 
standardize on that," he said, such as the move toward annotations 
with the JAX-WS spec. "It's good in terms of standardization, but in 
terms of flexibility and simplifying things, I'm not sure Java EE 5 
does that. I still see people going outside of Java EE to look for 
solutions."

Michael Bechauf, vice president of industry standards at SAP AG, said 
enterprise-grade SOA "must be secure, reliable and interoperable. 
However, beyond those technical characteristics, what's key is that a 
company needs to employ a consistent set of design rules across all 
its services. The services also need to be designed in a way that 
they can cover use cases across multiple industries. They need to use 
a consistent set of data types that interoperate with common industry 
vocabularies such as RosettaNet."

He continued, "The services need to have the right granularity to 
allow for both coarse-grained, message type, business-to-business 
communication, as well as fine-grained access into a business system 
so that customers can exploit those services for business flexibility 
and best practices in their lines of business. For fine-grained 
services, each call needs to transition the business system from one 
consistent state into another. Sometimes, flexibility needs to be 
traded-off against system consistency."

Enterprise-grade SOA means addressing all of the "ilities" -- 
scalability, reliability, manageability, etc. -- said Shaun Connolly, 
vice president of product management at JBoss Inc., and to address 
them in a way "that these capabilities are just baked into the 
platform." This would include the ability to get enterprise-grade 
features without the need to upgrade licenses or products, for 
example, and the ability to interoperate with existing 
infrastructure, he said.

All this said, organizations have to be asking themselves, just how 
much work is involved in taking existing enterprise apps and 
componentizing/service-enabling them? And does Java EE 5 make it 
easier?

"Java EE 5 as a technology platform has made it dramatically easier 
to service-enable an existing Java application," said SAP's Bechauf. 
"For example, Java annotations can easily service-enable a Java 
method. Tools also may help a great deal with the service-enabling. 
If you wanted to do this with a bare-bones IDE and had to write all 
of the code yourself using Web service APIs, it could be a fair 
amount of work. If you were to use a tool which helped automate this 
process, it would be much easier. For instance, tools such as SAP 
Composite Application Framework make service-enabling an application 
much easier." SAP CAF is based on the Eclipse 3.2 tools platform.

JBoss' Connolly said the work involved "depends on how the components 
being service-enabled were architected. For example, were they 
designed for distributed multi-threaded access? One of the things we 
always recommend to our customers is that they put in place an SOA 
governance structure so they spend the time on service-enabling the 
components/functionality that will actually drive business value. 
Just service-enabling everything, without keeping an eye towards the 
business goals, misses the entire point of why SOA has the ears of 
the CIOs."

Reaching beyond the platform

Vendors that are part of the EE 5 ecosystem like SAP and JBoss are 
offering broader capabilities than just Java EE 5, said Jason 
Bloomberg, a senior analyst with ZapThink LLC. "You still need 
scalable, transactional Web sites, and if you want [IBM] WebSphere or 
[BEA] WebLogic that makes sense, but if you're looking to do SOA 
you're not going to focus on the same priority. It's what BEA is 
struggling with as it moved to SOA 360 º, for example. [Vendors] are 
rethinking what it means to provide a SOA platform."

BEA's SOA 360º platform spans the three BEA product families – 
Tuxedo, WebLogic and AquaLogic – and is supported by the BEA 
WorkSpace 360º collaborative tooling environment. "With SOA 360 º, 
Java EE 5 is only a small piece," said Bill Roth, vice president of 
the BEA Workshop Business Unit at BEA Systems Inc.

While Roth said the company is not looking to distance itself from 
the Java platform, "are we saying things other than J2EE? Yes, for 
example an ESB is a useful way to think. There's no J in SOA, it 
opens up whole new world for us. The SOA world is not necessarily 
Java. Is Java the most productive platform for creating building 
blocks in SOA? Of course. Is it the best way to build everything? No."

Roth said he views building composite applications and Java EE 5 as 
orthogonal. "There are new technologies like Service Component 
Architecture, which describe how larger services are woven together 
and BPM [business process management], which talks about how services 
talk to each other. Java EE 5 [is about] how to build better 
services, but the process of weaving them together as an SOA is at a 
much larger level and might not involve Java."

Richard Monson-Haefel, a senior analyst at Burton Group Inc., points 
to the slew of technologies from Java vendors "that aren't related to 
Java EE at all. They have a large investment in those platforms and a 
large client base, so the majority will want to upgrade [to Java EE 
5], but not because it's superior to everything else."

Monson-Haefel said the Service Component Architecture (SCA) 
initiative "is supported by all the big players in EE space and SCA 
has little or nothing to do with EE."

SCA supports service implementations written using a variety of 
programming languages, including object-oriented languages, as well 
as Java, PHP, C++, and Cobol; XML-centric languages such as BPEL and 
XSLT; and declarative languages such as SQL and XQuery.

The fact that SCA is implemented on top of Java EE, but "doesn't 
reference Java EE specifically," is telling, Monson-Haefel said. "I 
don't have a lot of confidence that SCA will go anywhere, but all the 
vendors [involved] is indicative they're hedging their bets."

"SAP is heavily engaged with IBM, BEA, Oracle [and others], in 
building SCA," said SAP's Bechauf. "It's certainly true the larger 
application server vendors have come together and said, 'let's see if 
can use Java EE as a stable Java platform, but have more rapid 
release cycles for particular SOA technologies.' People want a stable 
Java platform, but they also want rapid innovation when it comes to 
SOA techniques. The way we're working in SCA is very rapidly; it's 
technology that uses EE 5 and rapidly develops innovation on top of 
that."

Bechauf continued, "Java EE 5 takes certain measures to reduce API-
centric nature; for example, it adopts the POJO [Plain Old Java 
Object] model for EJBs. However, further simplification of the JEE 
model is possible, specifically in regards to creating enterprise-
class composite applications involving existing and new assets." He 
said efforts like SCA and Service Data Objects (SDO) are more 
metadata driven and less API-centric. "Based on our recent 
implementation experience of JEE 5, we are currently defining how JEE 
can evolve to support the SCA and SDO technologies," he said.

Transition or stepping stone?

Monson-Haefel said Java EE is in transition. "Look at the focus of 
Java EE, it was almost entirely focused on simplifying the platform. 
That wouldn't be a major objective if they didn't sense that was the 
direction IT was going. The grassroots development community wants 
platforms that solve problems easier."

Nick Kassem, technology director for Web services at Sun Microsystems 
Inc., said rather than a transition, Java EE 5 is a "stepping stone" 
to SOA. "Java EE 5 offers a rich infrastructure; it's an enabler to 
SOA as opposed to a transition platform."

In fact, Kassem said, the story is still unfolding for what he calls 
"transactional Web services" and the intersection of the Enterprise 
Java Beans environment and the Web services environment. The recent 
release of NetBeans 5.5 -- an open source IDE that extends existing 
Java EE features, including Java Persistence support, EJB 3.0 and JAX-
WS -- is a step toward bringing those environments together, he said.

"We're getting away from the notion that you have EJB developers and 
Web services developers. The investment our customers are making in 
EJB 3.0 will be preserved and brought into the SOA world. EJB 
developers are developing mission-critical applications. You have to 
bring that into the SOA-centric world."

Part 3 of this series will look at the role of the Java Community 
Process in the wake of the Java EE 5 release. What are its current 
priorities? What has been learned from the initial half-year of Java 
EE 5? And what may lie ahead?>>

You can read this at:

<http://searchwebservices.techtarget.com/originalContent/
0,289142,sid26_gci1234422,00.html?track=NL-
110&ad=573547HOUSE&asrc=EM_NLN_832523&uid=5532089>

Reply via email to