On 15/12/06, Hitoshi Ozawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Steve Jones wrote:
>  > You are going to have to help me here, the provide a service but they
>  >
>  > aren't a service?  Sounds a bit zen.
>  >
>  >
>  Walmart is a business entity which provides and consumes services.
>  Would you actually create a business or IT service named "Walmart"?

They have created a service called Walmart they've even nicely packed
it up so consumers can interact with it...

http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/lcddata.html?ticker=WMT

>  >> Sometimes loose coupling is a good idea sometime it isn't.  Taking two
>  >> sports as examples, if you are a football (soccer) team then you are
>  >> pretty much loosely coupled with the players being interchangable to a
>  >> degree and the other players adapting to those changes dyanamically.
>  >> If you take an American Football (Joan Collins) team then there are
>  >> parts of it that are very tightly coupled as they run set passing
>  >> players and each player has to be in exactly the right place and other
>  >> players depend on them being there, system failure occurs when players
>  >> don't rigidly adhere to this plan.
>  >>
>  >> So that is what I mean by sensible coupling, don't assume that one
>  >> size fits all and go after loose coupling as a religion, just look at
>  >> the area you are working in and determine what level of coupling is
>  >> required.
>  >>
>  I think Anne mentioned this a while back, but we don't want to make
>  everything into a service.

Not technically no, but at the business level lots of things already
are services.  Quite often its just recognising the services as the
exist.

>  I'll also add to not make everything system be based on SOA.
>  The point that may be up for discussion is when we decide to create
>  services, whether there is any
>  benefit in having different degree of "looseness" between services.
>  Suppose we decide to assign number
>  from 0 to 10 to represent the looseness of services. Should there be
>  some services that are 0, some that
>  are 3, some that are 8, and some 10 in the same system?

Yes.

>
>  Cheers,
>  H.Ozawa
>
>                    

Reply via email to