Mark Baker wrote: > That depends what you mean. If you mean that interactions via other > protocols can be presented through a RESTful abstraction (e.g. > clicking on an ftp URI in a Web page), I'd agree. But if you mean > that the architecture of the system behind that abstraction is RESTful > (i.e. the resulting FTP session), I'd disagree. In fact, I can't > think of another protocol which, in general use, yields RESTful > systems. Did you have any in mind?
MODBUS is one example which has been around for quite some time. I'll not reiterate my arguments about RMI/Jini because those conversations always seem to end without any response to one of my posts. Either I'm not being clear, or people tire of the discussions. Gregg Wonderly
