Okay hands up I think its me (again). I'm not doing it to pretend to be anonymous, I just don't have the auto-pilot turned on.
Its an interesting SLA point though that many SLAs are "soft" in the world of business but that IT tends to only have the ability to encode "hard" SLAs. Certainly some companies use IT to get rid of unwanted soft SLAs but equally there need to be occasions where the SLA can be bent automatically based on rules, events, conditions and previous behaviour. So in the case below a allow for resubmission approach that enabled a "soft" rejection to be established would be an interesting challenge. Steve "Hanging my head in shame" Jones On 30/07/07, Gervas Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Against my better judgement I have just approved an unsigned message > from a regular contributor. Could you please all remember to put your > name at the end of your messages! I know most of you are very > conscientious in this regard, but I don't want this Group degenerating > into one of those semi-articulate fora where contributors think that > the illusion of anonymity gives them licence to write crap - that is > the Moderator's privilege in this Group :) > > Gervas > Moderator > > >
