Jeff,
Thanks, that is a much better way to put it. On fire is so hard to understand,
or agree with!
Eric
jeffrschneider wrote:
> +1
> We informally survey hundreds of companies on their SOA progams. My
> comment on Mule wasn't a knock on any other company - it was merely
> an observation that our surveys indicate a strong Mule presence.
> In many cases, Mule is being used in first projects, departmental
> efforts and often under the radar. It is an early winner - and I
> fully expect there to be more winners.
> Jeff
> --- In service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com , "Steve Jones"
> <jones.steveg@ ...> wrote:
>>
>> How should success be measured?
>>
>> How all OSS project successes are measured, by the vocal exploits
> of its
>> leaders and the size of the fan club.
>>
>> Being a bit harsh, but I agree that measuring OSS success is a
> beauty
>> parade. Too often the actually successful (the ones I see being
> used) are
>> the ones that don't get the coverage as they are developed by
> people who use
>> them, rather than people with a company to feed.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html
