Good point. I will dig into that as well!

Thanks for the advice.

Paul

On Dec 13, 2007 8:37 PM, mikomatsumura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> well if you go by the burton group (Anne) view, there's three pieces,
> metadata repository, service registry and policy repository, so you're
> not really looking into many use cases here wrt policy...
>
> Miko
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Paul
> Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Miko
> >
> > I agree that there are different usage patterns. If you look at an
> > enterprise reg/rep in particular, I also see five common actual usage
> > patterns of a given registry/repository:
> >
> > 1. A domain owner creating a space and managing permissions for that
> domain
> > - e.g. I'm the accounting manager and /domains/finance/accounts is where
> > accounting services live
> > 2. A developer or administrator publishing an entry - e.g. creating
> a new
> > service entry
> > 3. A system automatically publishing a service - e.g. the ESB
> publishing the
> > WSDL for this service
> > 4. A workflow system moving a service from test to production once tests
> > have been completed
> > 5. A runtime system reading an entry from the registry
> >
> > In my opinion various standard APIs are really only strongly useful for
> > points 3 and 4. The first two are perfectly easily done through a
> web UI,
> > and the last one is most likely simply an HTTP GET. So to me the real
> > question of the value of these APIs is - how do they benefit the
> enterprise
> > over the use of other more simple document oriented APIs like WebDAV and
> > AtomPub?
> >
> > Also have I missed any significant use cases?
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 1:21 PM, mikomatsumura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > I believe there will be three categories of use, application based
> > > soa, the project based "SOA", and enterprise or multi-enterprise...
> > >
> > > I think for an application based SOA, people will be able to continue
> > > to use Excel as the registry. For project based SOA I think
> > > lightweight approaches will be sufficient.
> > >
> > > But for federating multiple groups across the lifecycle or even
> > > multiple business units or companies, you might need to do some more
> > > "heavyweight" standards like ebRIM, JAXR, UDDI, LDAP and others, as
> > > well as having some workgroup capabilities and sophisticated access
> > > control, policy and governance capabilities. You might also want to
> > > look at WS-Policy for coordinating with runtime. I know you're pretty
> > > familiar with all this stuff, it's just what we are seeing from our
> > > customers. We get hundred plus page RFPs on this stuff... But I
> > > suppose it's all about governance and not just regrep.
> > >
> > > Miko
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "Paul
> > > Fremantle" <pzfreo@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I recently posted an entry on my blog about a new kind of SOA
> Registry
> > > > http://pzf.fremantle.org/2007/12/new-kind-of-soa-registry.html
> > > >
> > > > In summary, I'm talking about a very lightweight REST and Atom based
> > > > Registry that tries to meet the requirements of an SOA
> > > registry/repository
> > > > in the simplest, easiest, most resource-oriented fashion.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Paul
> > > > --
> > > > Paul Fremantle
> > > > Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
> > > > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> > > >
> > > > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> > > > paul@
> > > >
> > > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Paul Fremantle
> > Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
> > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> >
> > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

Reply via email to