I actually thought that this was the spaghetti definition of integration, multiple systems all connecting directly giving and n^n complexity.
Its certainly still integration but quite often its the worst form. Steve 2008/7/1 Todd Biske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Rob wrote, in response to Michael: > >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> IMO. App A and App B talking to each >>>> via any number of direct means is still integration. Same goes >>>> for provider x and provider y. . >>> >>> I do not think we reach an agreement in this ever. >> >> Not surprising. Not many agree with me on that particular point--it's >> viewed as too generic a definition of integration. >> > I agree with you Rob. I don't think an integration requires having a > third party involved, that's just one technique. > -tb > > Todd Biske > http://www.biske.com/blog > Sent from my iPhone >
