That's why these are among the things that need to be examined and potentially 
changed to adapt the IT culture for SOA.
For example, it may be necessary or helpful to reward a developer specifically 
for creating a reusable service, or penalize them when they don't.
Eric



----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Poulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 11:29:27 AM
Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] SO and enterprise (was Meehan & Anne 
on SOA Success - or lack of)


>I agree that incentive and compensation models tend to work very much 
>against the vision of enterprise SO.

Do we want to discuss this topic in this Forum or its a subject for another 
forum? Are here others who might be interested besides Rob and me?

- Michael



----- Original Message ----
From: Rob Eamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED] net>
To: service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 3:44:33 PM
Subject: [service-orientated -architecture] Re: Meehan & Anne on SOA Success - 
or lack of


--- In service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com, Michael 
Poulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .> wrote:
> 
> The major problem here are existing models of accountability and 
> ownership in the organisation. They allow (if not promote) a 
> difference of interests between the very top management, which 
> directly depends on the reaching of the enterprise goal(s), and the 
> lower levels of responsibilities, down to the regular project 
> management.

That's exactly right. The challenge is that senior leadership is 
measured and judged by how they manage their P&L--what's their bottom 
line contribution to the company. What's their contribution to 
shareholder dividends. The common approach to maximize the 
effectiveness of the enterprise is to try to maximize the 
effectiveness of each business individually and independently.

This means that business unit A doesn't really care about the 
performance of business unit B. If A doesn't trust B, there is no way 
they are going to rely on any facilties offerred by them. Indeed, in 
some organizations the units tend to compete with each other.

Business unit A, while they ostensibly care about the health of the 
overall enterprise, predominantly acts in its own interest--doing 
something for the good of the enterprise but possibly to the 
detriment of the business unit is something that has to be forced by 
a CEO.

I agree that incentive and compensation models tend to work very much 
against the vision of enterprise SO.

-Rob


 


      

Reply via email to