Wanted to canvass some opinion on how you guys go about designing the
contracts of your services and in particular how you tradeoff the
advantages of very specific constraints in your contract against the
problems this could cause in the future if/when things change.

The topic interests me becaus we're doing an integration thats going
to use a standard schema to communicate with a 3rd party, however most
of the integration is going to be done using our own custom schema
which has a lot of our own domain terminology/structure build into it.

So I'm wondering whether you would build constraints regarding things
like country/address/telephone codes into the schema itself or would
you just allow anything that passes a simple regular expression
through and just le the client or a run-time check in the integration
platform catch any violations (e.g. passing in "GPB" instead of "GBP")?

In some cases the decision is easy, if the data is very dynamic then
you would definitely avoid putting it into the contract. However I'm
interested in how you handle things that *might* change, even if
changes will happen very seldom if at all.

Reply via email to