2008/12/24 Gregg Wonderly <[email protected]>: > Steve Jones wrote: >> 2008/12/23 Rob Eamon <[email protected] <mailto:reamon%40cableone.net>>: > >> >> Agreed, its part of the EC bit. I think we are all agreeing here >> >> just using the wonderfully imprecise English language to do so. >> > >> > It's a wonder we communicate at all! Or at least we have the illusion >> > that we've done so. :-) >> >> Its the thing that continues to amaze me in IT, people who push for >> "natural language" definitions on the basis that these will be MORE >> understandable than technical ones ;) > > Isn't an SOA document a natural language definition of what everyone thinks > they > need for a solution?
Not sure I understand what you mean by this Gregg. Unless its irony around the word "thinks". Natural language is always open to interpretation and is always vague, especially English which seems to take a perverse desire in mangling itself up. Steve > > Gregg Wonderly >
