I've been positioning SOA as the true path for some time, but I have
never characterized it as a panacea or a silver bullet. I've always
said that it was hard work.

Anne

On 1/9/09, Rob Eamon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sure, sure. SO is the only path to salvation. Until the next thing
> comes along.
>
> In other forums I've been asking, "who's been positioning SOA as a
> panacea or a silver bullet?" Has it been you? :-)
>
> -Rob
>
> --- In [email protected], Michael
> Poulin <m3pou...@...> wrote:
>>
>> The new King - Service Orientation - would not agree with
>> this: "The items that will contribute to success are those in this
>> list. Not SO, in and of itself"
>>
>> Why SO is always right (like a customer)? Because SO is the core of
>> the Business (which, BTW, is the customer of IT). I think, this is
>> what Steve Jones means when saying that SOA is the business thing.
>> Another story with the second part of that expression - 'not all
>> customers are always right to you'. This may be read as not every
>> IT is up to the business needs.
>>
>> Things like "Focusing on business goals, values and benefits.
>> Collaborating and building consensus. Track and measure" will be
>> always successful if done in service-oriented manner.
>>
>> With regard to "Many prior efforts at transforming a company fail
>> but not because of the architectural approach nor the technology. I
>> conjecture that the root cause of those failures is often these
>> listed items" - to transform company, there should be a reason at
>> the level of risk of the company existence. In prosper time, such
>> reasons do not appear (acquisition is not always a disaster or
>> destruction for the acquired company; example: Cambridge Partners
>> was bought by Novell but who is managing Novell now? - Cambridge
>> Partners people). Another situation exist during the crisis -
>> disability to transform and do it quickly comes with the high
>> probability of crash.
>>
>> My theory is that Service Orientation at the enterprise level is
>> the survival receipt to the companies during the crisis. Why? I
>> will write about it in my blog.
>>
>> - Michael
>
>
>

Reply via email to