The subject is great, but I found the text a little bit confusing...One may
say I don´t have enough knowledge of some concepts to understand the text,
but I would reply "people who have it can learn something from it?".

Let´s put this way, as the Philadelphia´s lawyer would say: "explain it as
if I were 2 years old".

:-)

2009/3/6 Gervas Douglas <[email protected]>

>    <<*The SearchSOA.com community has asked **"What is the difference
> between RESTful transactions and Web Services transactions?"*
>
> First, it's helpful to define the terms a bit here, because people often
> have a reaction to the term "transaction" that doesn't distinguish between
> local and global transactions. Local transactions are used in every almost
> every database operation today, and this is exactly the same for both Web
> services and RESTful applications.
>
> The question therefore really pertains to global transactions -- those that
> involve more than one database, potentially on different computers -- since
> that's where things are very different. (I should also clarify that Web
> services are a technology while REST is an architectural approach, so this
> is going to be a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison.)
>
> Web services transactions (as defined in the OASIS WS-Transactions set of
> specifications) are intended to be compatible with existing TP
> infrastructures, which basically evolved from mainframe systems. The REST
> approach, on the other hand, evolved from the Web, which is based on an
> entirely different technology stream. Some of the key differences derive
> from the very different assumptions behind mainframe systems and Web based
> systems.
>
> Mainframe systems were designed assuming an environment for resources and
> users under the control of a single organization. Web based systems on the
> other hand were designed assuming a world wide network of independent but
> cooperating systems under the control of different organizations and
> individuals. Today's corporate IT systems can be more or less divided
> between those developed before the Web and those developed for the Web.
> Systems designed for the Web have much less control over things like
> workload, uptime, the need to provide a good experience to users, etc. These
> different assumptions impact transactions because they result in very
> different solutions to the requirement for distributed access to shared
> data, or shared state.
>
> At the technical level the biggest manifestation of the difference is in
> the design of the communications system. Transactional communications
> mechanisms that evolved from mainframe designs use persistent sessions to
> share state between programs. The communications protocol used in REST
> oriented systems, HTTP, does not support persistent sessions because they
> negatively impact scalability. If you are operating in a carefully
> controlled environment, that impact is manageable.
>
> For compatibility with existing shared state mechanisms, Web services
> transactions propagate shared transactional context among participants in a
> global transaction so that each participant's access to shared state can be
> coordinated with the others. REST based transactions assume that only one
> party to a global transaction accesses the shared state at any given time,
> sort of like passing a token. The other participants have no knowledge of
> what's going on at another participant and their operations on shared state
> can't be coordinated. They are responsible only for knowing what they must
> do when they receive the shared state – when it's their turn. This creates
> is a very different design requirement for handling failure and recovery,
> since it cannot be automated, the trade off in additional application level
> design and coding pays results in a system better suited to the assumptions
> of the Web.
>
> *Eric Newcomer is a distributed computing specialist and independent
> consultant. Newcomer is a chair of the OSGi Alliance Enterprise Expert Group
> and former CTO of IONA Technologies. He writes a blog on OSGi 
> matters<http://modualrit.blogspot.com/>
> .>>
> *
>
> *You can find this at:
> http://searchsoa.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid26_gci1350094,00.html
> *
>
> *Gervas
> *
>  
>



-- 
Marcelo Augusto Costa

Reply via email to