I believe that Steve gives you his answer. My solution for this is re-formulate 
'business process' into service-oriented terms and engage service flexibility 
(no necessary manual or automated but, possibly, a mixture of them). So, the 
terms are (from 'Ladder to SOE' and"Do we really, really have to deal with 
BPMand 'processes'?" at 
http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/service_oriented/2009/04/do_we_really_really_have_to_deal_with_bpm_and_processes.php):

        * business process is defined as business service via final goal, RWE 
and input data/interface, i.e. as a regular service
        * business process relationship with other entities (outside of its 
boarded) and dependencies are defined via service relationship and dependencies
        * business process' internal logic is externalised and delegated to the 
decision making services
        * business process actions are services (automated, manual or their 
mixture)
        * business process action-services are engaged based on offered 
business functionality and RWE rather than based on preliminary defined 
coupling between orchestrating entity and action-servicesIn addition, I, once 
again, has to mention that choreography(as it is defined today) is the least 
suitable process mechanism from the process flexibility perspective 
("Service-oriented chess game: choreography or orchestration?" at 
http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/service_oriented/2009/05/service-oriented_chess_game_choreography_or_orchestration_part_1.php)

- Michael






________________________________
From: htshozawa <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2009 8:52:32 PM
Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Anne again on SOA's Mortality





--- In service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com, Steve Jones 
<jones.steveg@ ...> wrote:

> Which is indeed true and why fixed BPM engines are often very poor as
> BUSINESS process engines as they don't allow flexible business
> decisions.
> 
So, what is your suggestion on obtaining a flexibility in business process 
technically or are you suggesting that we should be doing business activities 
all by hand?

H.Ozawa


   


      

Reply via email to