What is the OASIS SOA RM if not a concrete definition. Or is it just that people keep wanting "their" local optimisations rather than agreeing some principles and moving on.
Steve 2009/10/30 Colin <[email protected]> > > > > Because there are so many competing technologies, believing they > > are the true savior of distributed systems, we find conversations > > in the abstract because the details of the other systems are not > > familiar, or not aligned directly with the familiar technologies > > that they can describe in intimate details. > > I actually find the opposite is true, people often become so mired in the > details of one technology path they are incapable of discussing things with > people in another area. > > > I don't find it one bit alarming that no decisive description > > exists yet. > > Alarming, definitely not. However it would definitely be helpful if we had > more concrete descriptions, however my point was really that without some > context the manifesto becomes a little weak. > > > People who don't think technology is an "answer" (perhaps they > > believe it's a random choice or unimportant in some way?) that you > > need to have for SOA design are just not thinking about the time > > and monetary commitment that "building" an SOA really requires. > > Technology alone certainly isn't a complete answer. In no way is it a > random or unimportant choice either, who said it was? > > Ta, > > Colin > > >
