Ashraf Galal wrote:
> "Not quite true. If the client side is doing XML schema validation then
> the new attribute will blow their validation based on the old
>
> schema. This isn't any different from using RPC style and although I'd use
> doc/literal for exchange in WS-* I'd still consider it an RPC
> style of communication."
>
> A major problem in adopting RPC style is that, the exchanged XML
> documents cannot be validated against an *XML Schema Definition (XSD).*
I tend to agree with Steve Jones in this regard. Any client that
performs validation over the document received turns the interchange in
a kind of RPC, checking its inputs and failing if one of such inputs is
wrong.
>
> Processes are focused on composition (orchestrating) of services (fine- or
> coarse-grained) and discuss in that sense services (fine- or coarse-grained)
> become process activities.
>
Composition of services could exist also as a choreography, isn't it?
Regards
Javier Castañón
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
