Michael Poulin wrote: > I, probably, agree with you, Steve, now but your initial '+1' sounded > scary and right about implementation. > > Conceptually, any service is a sort of RPC to everybody. However, we > have to be explicit where the concept transforms into an implementation > and at which point the Procedure becomes complex enough to its > developers to think twice before developing just a simple Remote Call.
I still think that people are having a really hard time understanding how "transporting something to work on, to another entity" can be packaged in multiple ways. RPC-like interfaces don't make this impossible nor too complex. Michael, can you illustrate a situation where an RPC-like interface would not make it possible to do something? You seem to have a case in mind. Gregg Wonderly
