Here is an early webrev of the changes I'm working on. 

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/remove-bugspot/webrev/

This isn't a formal code review yet, but I'll be happy for any feedback on the 
changes.

Thanks,
/Staffan


On 16 apr 2012, at 10:51, Krystal Mok wrote:

> Hi Staffan,
> 
> Alright, then I'm ok with this :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> Kris
> 
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Staffan Larsen <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Hi Krystal,
> 
> Those tools can all use HotSpotAgent instead without any loss of 
> functionality.
> 
> Regards,
> /Staffan
> 
> 
> On 16 apr 2012, at 10:21, Krystal Mok wrote:
> 
>> Hi Staffan,
>> 
>> There are quite a few tools depending on BugSpotAgent for attaching. At 
>> least all tools that inherit from sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.Tool do.
>> Removing the BugSpot frontend shouldn't affect those tools, or would it?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Kris
>> 
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Staffan Larsen <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> All,
>> 
>> I'd like to remove the BugSpot front end from SA in an effort to clean up 
>> the SA code and reduce the number of implementations. My understanding is 
>> that BugSpot was intended as a more general native debugger not only focused 
>> on the JVM, but that it was never fully implemented. I don't think there is 
>> a need for a general-purpose debugger in SA.
>> 
>> The features that will change are:
>> * BugSpot graphical UI will be removed
>> * PStack and PMap will no longer be able to operate on executables other 
>> than the JVM
>> * Some code only referenced from BugSpot will be removed
>> 
>> Does anyone know of a reason this is not a good idea? I don't have the full 
>> history of SA nor all the use cases so I would appreciate feedback.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> /Staffan
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to