Serguei, I continue with this issue, but because of intermittent nature of the failure it takes a time.
-Dmitry On 2012-08-22 01:05, [email protected] wrote: > Dmitry, > > I see your point. > It is still interesting what is the cause of the asynchronous detach as > it might bite us again. > > Thanks, > Serguei > > > On 8/21/12 1:24 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: >> Serguei, >> >> The test stop falling, this is the reason I send the webrev, >> but test never fail constantly so I couldn't be sure >> I fix the problem. >> >> -Dmitry >> >> On 2012-08-22 00:15, [email protected] wrote: >>> Dmitry, >>> >>> It is not clear how would moving the enqueue() call into the >>> synchronized statement solve the asynchronous detach issue. >>> Will this issue come back in some other form? >>> The test is still going to fail intermittently, right? >>> What is reason of the the asynchronous detach? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Serguei >>> >>> >>> On 8/21/12 12:23 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: >>>> On 21/08/2012 20:05, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: >>>>> Hi Everybody, >>>>> >>>>> Please review small fix. >>>>> >>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/7162400/webrev.02/ >>>>> >>>>> -Dmitry >>>>> >>>> Can you explain the issue a bit further? Looking at the code I can see >>>> there may be an issue with asynchronous detach (my default, I didn't >>>> get that right in the original implementation) but I can't tell if >>>> this is what you are trying to address now. >>>> >>>> -Alan >> > -- Dmitry Samersoff Java Hotspot development team, SPB04 * There will come soft rains ...
