Hi Coleen,

Thank you a lot for looking at it and noticing this problem!
The link as you see it is correct:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2013/hotspot/8007037-JVMTI-JSR292.1/
but the hidden (underlying) link is incorrect:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2013/hotspot/8008511-JVMTI-JSR292.1/


This happened when I copy-pasted the fragment from my previous
review request and replaced it with the new one.
As occurred, the the underlying link was not replaced as expected when I edited this way.
I'll be more careful in the future.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 4/1/13 1:12 PM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:

Hi Serguei,
I was going to review this one too but it looks like the same as the last one. Is the webrev the wrong repository?
thanks,
Coleen

On 03/27/2013 07:45 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Please, review the hs25 fix below.

Open webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2013/hotspot/8007037-JVMTI-JSR292.1/

CR:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8007037
https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8007037


References from INDY bootstrap method specifier operands to CP entries
and back must be correctly merged at class redefinition.

Some background.

An invokedynamic bytecode spec:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se7/html/jvms-6.html#jvms-6.5.invokedynamic

A invokedynamic instruction has an argument which is an index to the *Constant Pool* item.
That index must be a symbolic reference to a *call-site specifier*:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se7/html/jvms-4.html#jvms-4.4.10

A CP item of the type *CONSTANT_InvokeDynamic_inf* has an index into
the *bootstrap method attribute* of the class file:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se7/html/jvms-4.html#jvms-4.7.21

The *|BootstrapMethods|* attribute elements normally have references to other *Constant Pool* items.

In VM the *bootstrap method attribute* is represented by the *operands* array of the *ConstantPool*.

The problem is is that all the force and back cross links between *ConstantPool* elements and *operands* array elements must be correctly merged at class redefinition.

Test coverage:
vm.mlvm, nsk.jvmti, nsk.jdi tests on multiple platforms (32 vs 64-bit too).
  The testing looks good so far.
One difficulty is that new vm.mlvm tests are currently failed because of multiple reasons.


Thanks,
Serguei




Reply via email to