On 5/20/2013 10:34 PM, David Holmes wrote:
<added servicability>
Hi Joe,
As I have previously stated you copied the struct definitions instead
of moving them outside the ifdef.
I fixed this and will send out a new webrev.
joe
Serviceability folk: we are particularly interested in whether the use
of ticks_no_class_load is deemed appropriate in this situation. Who
will be consuming this value?
Thanks,
David
On 21/05/2013 5:10 AM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
The change is to include forte.cpp in the minimal jvm but to
conditionalize the code so that
only AsyncGetCallTrace() is defined with the minimal jvm.
Webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jprovino/8013461/webrev.00/
* JDK-8013461 <https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8013461>There is
a symbol AsyncGetCallTrace in libjvm.symbols that does not exist in
minimal/libjvm.a when DEBUG_LEVEL == release
<https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8013461>
Thanks.
joe
