Extra eyes are always welcome! Thanks!
The vm.quick Adhoc is already finished without any regressions...
I'm just waiting for the 12 hour stress test runs to finish...
Dan
On 3/25/14 4:37 PM, [email protected] wrote:
In case, you need extra review ...
All looks good to me.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 3/25/14 3:15 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Thanks Coleen!
Dan
On 3/25/14 4:05 PM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
this is fine.
Coleen
On 3/25/14 6:03 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
I put this in the bug report, but maybe putting it in
the e-mail thread will make things easier:
Daniel Daugherty added a comment - 2014-03-24 16:51
Here's the remaining diffs between the 8u-hs-dev and JDK9-hs
versions of the file:
$ diff src/share/vm/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp{,.jdk9-hs}
237c237
< // dequeue operation after acquisition (in the ::enter() epilog) and
---
> // dequeue operation after acquisition (in the ::enter()
epilogue) and
692c692
< // ST Responsible=null; MEMBAR (in enter epilog - here)
---
> // ST Responsible=null; MEMBAR (in enter epilogue - here)
2058c2058
< // Slighty racy, but benign ...
---
> // Slightly racy, but benign ...
Anyone? :-)
Dan
On 3/25/14 10:53 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Greetings,
Mr Simms' fix for the following bug has been backported to
JDK8u-hs-dev:
8028280 ParkEvent leak when running modified runThese which only
loads classes
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028280
which allows the JDK8u-hs-dev version of the fix for the following
bug
to be updated to match the JDK9-hs version:
8028073 race condition in ObjectMonitor implementation causing
deadlocks
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028073
This minor tweak is being done with the following bug:
8038274 update 8u fix for 8028073 now that 8028280 is
backported to 8u
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038274
Here is the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8038274-webrev/0-jdk8u-hs-dev/
Since this is effectively a backport from JDK9-hs -> JDK8u-hs-dev,
I'm looking for one sanity check (R)eviewer or reviewer from the
original set of folks that reviewed 8028073:
The JDK9 reviewers: dholmes, sspitsyn, dice, acorn
The JDK8u reviewers: rdurbin, acorn, sspitsyn, dsimms, dholmes
Because I'm paranoid, I'm running the same set of vm.quick testing
Adhoc test jobs and StressMonitorWait testing that was done on the
JDK9 and JDK8u versions of the fix.
Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions or suggestions.
Dan
