Carsten,

I've filed the following new bug to track this potential issue:

JDK-8072439 fix for 8047720 may need more work
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072439

Dan

On 2/3/15 12:00 PM, Carsten Varming wrote:
Greetings all,

I was recently introduced to the deadlock described in JDK-8047720 and fixed in JDK9. The fix seems a little messy to me, and it looks like it left some very short races in the code. So I decided to clean up the code. See attached diff.

The change takes a step back and acquires PeriodicTask_lock in WatcherThread::stop (like before the fix in JDK9), but this time safepoints are allowed to proceed when acquiring PeriodicTask_lock, preventing the deadlock.

Let me know what you think,
Carsten


Reply via email to