Hi Dan,
This was pushed with:
-Xlog:jvmti+objecttagging=debug
/Robbin
On 04/19/2016 06:06 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Please, no shorter than 'objtag'. Object needs to be in there
somewhere... 'tagging' is just too general.
Dan
On 4/19/16 5:16 AM, Robbin Ehn wrote:
Hi Serguei,
Thanks!
/Robbin
On 04/19/2016 12:05 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Robbin,
The fix loos good.
I'd like to have the tag-set name shorter but prefer "objecttagging"
over "tagging".
Also, I'm thinking if the tag-set name should include the "jvmti"
prefix.
But, please, use your judgement as it has to be consistent with the
overall design.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/19/16 02:46, Robbin Ehn wrote:
Hi Marcus,
On 04/19/2016 11:16 AM, Marcus Larsson wrote:
Hi,
On 04/14/2016 01:52 PM, Robbin Ehn wrote:
Hi all,
Please review:
This moves jvmti object-tagging output to the tag-set
jvmti,objecttagging on debug level.
The TraceJVMTIObjectTagging argument is deprecated and aliased with:
"-Xlog:jvmti+objecttagging=debug"
Did this on top of:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2016-April/019007.html
but only part common is the jvmti tag (logTag.hpp).
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rehn/8154059/
I think 'objecttagging' is a bit too long. Maybe we could just
call it
'tagging'? I'm fine with leaving it as is as well, just wanted to
suggest the alternative.
If the "second" reviewer concur, I'll change it.
Looks good in any case!
Thanks!
/Robbin
Thanks,
Marcus
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154059
Thanks!
/Robbin