Hi Serguei,

 

We’re currently using jtreg 4.2 b02, so you should be able to do this.

 

Thanks,

Christian

 

From: serviceability-dev [mailto:serviceability-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] 
On Behalf Of serguei.spit...@oracle.com
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 7:39 PM
To: Alexander Kulyakhtin <alexander.kulyakh...@oracle.com>
Cc: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR:8153978:New test to verify the modules info as returned by the 
JVMTI

 

Hi Alexander,

I'm curious if the jtreg 4.2 is out and this test can be pushed now?
I'd want to use the same pattern to write the Jigsaw related JVMTI tests.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 5/5/16 04:25, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:

Sergey,

Thank you very much for the review. 
I will be pushing the fix as soon as jtreg 4.2 is out, since 4.2  has the fix 
for CODETOOLS-7901662, required for this test.

Best regards,
Alexander

From: serguei.spit...@oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com> 
To: alexander.kulyakh...@oracle.com <mailto:alexander.kulyakh...@oracle.com> 
Cc: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net 
<mailto:serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net> , aleksey.voyti...@oracle.com 
<mailto:aleksey.voyti...@oracle.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 11:31:07 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
Subject: Re: RFR:8153978:New test to verify the modules info as returned by the 
JVMTI

Hi Alexander,

It looks good.
Thank you for making the changes!

Thanks,
Serguei



On 5/4/16 05:17, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:

Hi Sergey,

Thank you very much for the review.

Please, find the updated webrev with your findings corrected at: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/8153978_02/index.html 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eakulyakh/8153978_02/index.html> 

Best regards,
Alexander

----- Original Message -----
From: serguei.spit...@oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com> 
To: alexander.kulyakh...@oracle.com <mailto:alexander.kulyakh...@oracle.com> , 
serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net 
<mailto:serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net> 
Cc: aleksey.voyti...@oracle.com <mailto:aleksey.voyti...@oracle.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 1:06:05 AM GMT +03:00 Iraq
Subject: Re: RFR:8153978:New test to verify the modules info as returned by the 
JVMTI

Hi Alexander,


Could you, fix a couple of minor issues?

test/serviceability/jvmti/GetModulesInfo/JvmtiGetAllModulesTest.java

  58         for(Module mod : my.modules()) {
  59             if(!jvmtiModules.contains(mod)) {
 
  A space is missed after the 'for' and 'if' keywords.


test/serviceability/jvmti/GetModulesInfo/ModulesInfo.java.

  31     boolean compareExcludingUnnamed(ModulesInfo other) {
 
  I'd suggest to call it compareNamed.


Otherwise, the new test looks great.
Thanks a lot for taking care about it!

Thanks,
Serguei



On 4/29/16 06:12, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:

Hi, 
 
Could you, please, review these test-only changes (adding a new test).
 
CR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153978 "New test to verify the 
modules info as returned by the JVMTI"
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/8153978_01/ 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eakulyakh/8153978_01/> 
 
The new test verifies that JVMTI returns the correct info about the modules 
loaded at the application startup. 
It also verifies that the returned info is consistent with the same info 
returned by the Java API.
It then loads a new named module and checks the correctness of the JVMTI info 
again.
 
Due to a tools issue https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7901662 the 
test can only be pushed in when the updated jtreg is released.
The test passes fine with the nightly jtreg build, containing the 
CODETOOLS-7901662 fix.
 
Best regards,
Alexander

 

 

 

Reply via email to