On 22/06/2016 19:36, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
No objection from me. It would be good to first check the existing spec and also the JNI spec to see if there any similar cases (so that the update and new function is consistent). Off-hand, I can't think of any functions that require the same check.Alan, please, let me know if you support the Stanislav's suggestion.I can go ahead and implement returning the JVMTI_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ARGUMENT for invalid package names.
-Alan
