Hi Dmitry,

Thanks a lot for this additional test coverage and discovering new bug:
  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165681

The tests look pretty good to me.

A couple of minor comments.

Dots are missed in the .c files comments.


http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddmitriev/8150758/webrev.00/test/serviceability/jvmti


 265         printf("Expecting to find '%s' class in ClassLoad events duringVM start 
phase.\n", EXPECTED_SIGNATURE);
 266         if (class_in_class_load_events_vm_start == JNI_FALSE) {
 267             throw_exc(env, "Unable to find expected class in ClassLoad events 
duringstart phase!\n");
 268             return FAILED;
 269         }
 270
 271         if (class_prepare_events_vm_start_count == 0) {
 272             throw_exc(env, "Didn't get ClassPrepare events in start 
phase!\n");
 273             return FAILED;
 274         }
 275
 276         printf("Expecting to find '%s' class in ClassPrepare events duringVM 
start phase.\n", EXPECTED_SIGNATURE);
 277         if (class_in_class_prepare_events_vm_start == JNI_FALSE) {
 278             throw_exc(env, "Unable to find expected class in ClassPrepare 
events duringstart phase!\n");
 279             return FAILED;
 280         }


Could you, please, replace "start phase" with "early start phase"? It will be more clear that the start phase mode is "early".

 288         if (class_in_class_prepare_events_vm_start == JNI_TRUE) {
 289             throw_exc(env, "Class is found in ClassLoad events duringVM Start 
phase!\n");
 290             return FAILED;
 291         }
 292
 293         printf("Expecting that '%s' class is absent in ClassPrepare 
events.\n", EXPECTED_SIGNATURE);
 294         if (class_in_class_prepare_events_vm_start == JNI_TRUE) {
 295             throw_exc(env, "Class is found in ClassPrepare events duringVM 
Start phase!\n");
 296             return FAILED;
 297         }

Could you, please, replace "VM Start phase" with "normal VM start phase"? It will be more clear that the start phase mode is "normal". Thanks, Serguei On 9/19/16 05:47, Dmitry Dmitriev wrote:
Hello, Please review new tests for module aware agents. There are 3 tests: 1) MAAClassFileLoadHook.java - verifies ClassFileLoadHook event with different combinations of can_generate_early_vmstart and can_generate_early_class_hook_events JVMTI capabilities. Expects to find(or not) class from java.base module in the right VM phase. 2) MAAClassLoadPrepare.java - verifies ClassLoad and ClassPrepare events with and without can_generate_early_vmstart JVMTI capability. Expects to find(or not) class from java.base module in the VM start phase. 3) MAAThreadStart.java - verifies ThreadStart event with can_generate_early_vmstart JVMTI capability. Expect to find events in the VM start phase. JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150758 webrev.00: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddmitriev/8150758/webrev.00/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eddmitriev/8150758/webrev.00/> Testing: RBT on all platforms Thanks, Dmitry

Reply via email to