Hi,

Please find the updated webrev with suggested changes
Webrev - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8173664/webrev.01/
BugID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173664 

Thanks,
Fairoz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fairoz Matte
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 9:05 AM
> To: David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com>; serviceability-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: RFR: JDK-8173664: Typo in https://java.net/downloads/heap-
> snapshot/hprof-binary-format.html
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> After having discussion with you over IM things are clear Expected change is -
> "There will be a "LOAD CLASS" tag for the type of each array in the dump"
> and current changeset missed "the" before type.
> 
> I will make the changes and send it again.
> 
> Thanks,
> Fairoz
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Holmes
> > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 7:52 AM
> > To: Fairoz Matte <fairoz.ma...@oracle.com>; serviceability-
> > d...@openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8173664: Typo in
> > https://java.net/downloads/heap- snapshot/hprof-binary-format.html
> >
> > On 10/05/2017 9:30 PM, Fairoz Matte wrote:
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: David Holmes
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 3:26 PM
> > >> To: Fairoz Matte <fairoz.ma...@oracle.com>; serviceability-
> > >> d...@openjdk.java.net
> > >> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8173664: Typo in
> > >> https://java.net/downloads/heap- snapshot/hprof-binary-format.html
> > >>
> > >> Hi Fairoz,
> > >>
> > >> On 10/05/2017 5:53 PM, Fairoz Matte wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> Kindly review the small typo fix, applicable only for JDK8
> > >>> BugID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173664
> > >>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8173664/webrev/
> > >>
> > >> I think "for type type" was intended to be "for the type".
> > >>
> > > Yes it does look like after reading multiple times.
> > > Thanks for the review I will close as Not an issue
> >
> > ??? It is still a typo that can be fixed.
> >
> > David
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Fairoz
> > >
> > >> David
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Fairoz
> > >>>

Reply via email to