Hi Serguei,
Do the new tests pass in your runs?
Of course.
It seems not to exist jtreg native libraries.
I've tested as below:
$ make build-test-hotspot-jtreg-native
$ cd test
$ $JT_HOME/bin/jtreg -ignore:quiet
-nativepath:<builddir>/<confdir>/support/test/hotspot/jtreg/native/lib
hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/attach hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti
jdk/com/sun/tools/attach
Good news is that the attach-related tests from closed repository are passed.
Thanks!
Yasumasa
On 2017/11/15 16:38, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
Do the new tests pass in your runs?
In my runs 3 of 4 tests are failed with the errors like this:
109 Running DCMD 'JVMTI.agent_load
/var/tmp/sspitsyn/tst/jdk.attach/JTwork/scratch/null/lib/libException.so'
through 'PidJcmdExecutor'
110 Executing command
'[/var/tmp/sspitsyn/jdk.attach/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/images/jdk/bin/jcmd,
21951, JVMTI.agent_load
/var/tmp/sspitsyn/tst/jdk.attach/JTwork/scratch/null/lib/libException.so]'
111 Command returned with exit code 0
112 ---------------- stdout ----------------
113 21951:
114 /var/tmp/sspitsyn/tst/jdk.attach/JTwork/scratch/null/lib/libException.so
was not loaded.
115 /var/tmp/sspitsyn/tst/jdk.attach/JTwork/scratch/null/lib/libException.so:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
116
Good news is that the attach-related tests from closed repository are passed.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 11/14/17 16:40, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
It looks good to me.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 11/7/17 22:38, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Serguei,
I uploaded new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8165736/webrev.02/
I'd expect a check for some exception name, not for details like: For
input string: "apa".
Should we remove this comparison?
I don't understand. Why do remove?
Would it better to check for the exception name instead?
I've changed to check exception name (NumberFormatException) in
StartManagementAgent.java.
I will sponsor this fix and run these tests before the push.
Thanks!
I'm waiting for second reviewer.
Yasumasa
2017-11-08 11:55 GMT+09:00 serguei.spit...@oracle.com
<serguei.spit...@oracle.com>:
On 11/6/17 04:31, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Serguei,
On 2017/11/06 20:06, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
The changes looks good.
Thank you for making them!
Thanks!
On 11/3/17 05:10, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Serguei,
Thank you for your comment!
I uploaded new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8165736/webrev.01/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8165736/webrev.00/test/jdk/com/sun/tools/attach/StartManagementAgent.java.udiff.html
- if (!ex.getMessage().contains("Invalid
com.sun.management.jmxremote.port number")) {
+ if (!ex.getMessage().contains("For input string: \"apa\"")) {
What is the motivation for this change?
It seems, the original comparison is better.
"ex" is AttachOperationFailedException.
We can get the result as below when we run StartManagementAgent:
-------------
[runApplication] Error: Invalid com.sun.management.jmxremote.port
number: apa
[runApplication] jdk.internal.agent.AgentConfigurationError:
java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "apa"
[runApplication] at
jdk.management.agent/sun.management.jmxremote.ConnectorBootstrap.startRemoteConnectorServer(ConnectorBootstrap.java:336)
-------------
I think we should check exception message in
AttachOperationFailedException.
In fact, jtreg fails at this point in my environment.
I'd expect a check for some exception name, not for details like: For
input string: "apa".
Should we remove this comparison?
I don't understand. Why do remove?
Would it better to check for the exception name instead?
What tests did you run to make sure there are no regressions?
I've tested the following testcases:
- hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/attach
- hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti
- jdk/com/sun/tools/attach
There are more tests related to dynamic attach in closed,
nsk.aod.testlist and 30+ attach tests in nsk.jvmti.testlist.
I'm not sure, if they are included into any of the Mach5 testing levels.
Will need to check.
We have to make sure these tests are still passed.
I cannot access JPRT and closed testcases because I'm not an Oracle
employee.
Can you run them with this change?
Ok.
I will sponsor this fix and run these tests before the push.
It seems, another update and one more review is needed.
Thanks,
Serguei
Thanks,
Yasumasa
Thanks,
Serguei
Thanks,
Yasumasa
On 2017/11/03 16:31, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
Some comments.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8165736/webrev.00/test/jdk/com/sun/tools/attach/StartManagementAgent.java.udiff.html
- if (!ex.getMessage().contains("Invalid
com.sun.management.jmxremote.port number")) {
+ if (!ex.getMessage().contains("For input string: \"apa\"")) {
What is the motivation for this change?
It seems, the original comparison is better.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8165736/webrev.00/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/AttachFailed/AttachException.java.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8165736/webrev.00/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/AttachFailed/AttachIncorrectLibrary.java.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8165736/webrev.00/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/AttachFailed/AttachNoEntry.java.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8165736/webrev.00/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/AttachFailed/AttachReturnError.java.html
37 public void run(CommandExecutor executor) {
38 try{
A space is missed after 'try'.
It is odd that all test java classes define exactly the same
methods: sharedObjectName(), jmx() and cli().
Would it better to defin a common base class with these methods?
Otherwise, it looks good.
Thank you for taking care about it!
What tests did you run to make sure there are no regressions?
Thanks,
Serguei
On 11/1/17 05:59, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
PING: Could you review and sponsor it?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8165736/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Yasumasa
On 2017/09/29 13:24, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi all,
If we try to attach invalid JVMTI agent via JVMTI.agent_load dcmd, we
will get "Command executed successfully". However, it implies error
in
JVMTIAgentLoadDCmd.
This message is from JCmd.java when jcmd does not receive any output
from target VM.
I think HotSopt/jcmd should return useful error message to users to
understand the cause of failure.
I uploaded webrev for this issue. Could you review it?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8165736/webrev.00/
This change is work fine on Fedora 26 x86_64 as following jtreg
testcases:
- hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/attach
- hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti
- jdk/com/sun/tools/attach
I cannot access JPRT. So I need a sponsor.
(I cannot test it on other platforms.)
Thanks,
Yasumasa
