My apologies Patrick...I should have added the comment first before closing. I have added it now.
Regards, Raga -----Original Message----- From: Alan Bateman Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 2:52 PM To: Patrick Reinhart Cc: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: JDK-8171311 Current state On 07/12/2018 08:36, Patrick Reinhart wrote: > It's a bit disturbing that just at the time of my question this JEP > has been closed (without any further comment why) I suspect your inquiry prompted Raghavan to close it as there isn't (to my knowledge anyway) anyone actively working on it. I agree a comment is needed when closing issues. > > I think that it still would be worth while looking into supporting > a REST based implementation in favour of the existing RMI based > solution just by the fact of the troubles just one can have with > firewalls. Right, and I think there is some interest. In addition to the REST adapters that you found then I think some of the app servers have support too. The big question for features like this is whether it is something that the JDK has to include or not (the batteries included vs. batteries available discussion). If you look at Harsha's prototype (linked from the JEP) then you'll you see it can be mostly developed in its own project, the only JDK piece is integrating it with the JMX agent and existing -Dcom.sun.management options for starting the JMX agent. I think this is an area that could be improved to make it easier to deploy JMX adapters that aren't in the JDK. -Alan
