The modified webrev is at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8213457/webrev.01/
I will address the moving the test out of tier1 as a separate defect.
Thank you,
Jini.
On 1/4/2019 2:38 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 1/3/19 11:37 AM, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
On Jan 3, 2019, at 10:26 AM, Jini George <jini.geo...@oracle.com> wrote:
Thank you very much, Chris, for taking a look. I will modify the
timeout value to be 480 ==> 8 minutes ==> 32 minutes for tier1.
Sounds good ?
I think it makes a sense to move this test out of tier1. It takes too
long time for tier1.
Agreed. I think changing the timeout to 480 is fine, but this test does
run too long for tier1.
Chris
Leonid
Thanks!
Jini.
On 1/3/2019 9:54 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Jini,
2400 seems excessive. That's 40 minutes, which translates to 160
minutes for our test runs. Did you mean timeout=240? It looks like a
few of the Clhsdb tests were given large timeouts that are probably
much more than is needed.
thanks,
Chris
On 1/2/19 6:51 PM, Jini George wrote:
Hello!
Requesting reviews for a small fix for fixing the timeout failures
of the test: ClhsdbInspect.java by increasing the timeout value.
BugID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213457
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8213457/webrev.00/index.html
The fix has been tested with about 200 repeated runs on windows
post this fix. The timeout was not observed.
Thanks,
Jini.
