Hi Erik,

the overhead is very small. In fact, I wasn’t able to measure it in a 
reproduceable way. And yes, it works on Mac OS, I use a Mac.

> could change the contentType to "bits-per-second”. That is what we use for 
> the Network Utilization event which reports statistics per interface.

Yes, I can do that. Only for the network IO or for file IO as well?

Thanks for looking into this,
Gunter

From: serviceability-dev <serviceability-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> on 
behalf of Erik Gahlin <erik.gah...@oracle.com>
Date: Monday, 14. January 2019 at 22:32
To: "serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net" 
<serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net>, "hotspot-jfr-...@openjdk.java.net" 
<hotspot-jfr-...@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: [RFR]: Per thread IO statistics in JFR

Hi Gunter, 

Sounds like a useful enhancement!

Do you have an idea of what the overhead might be? 

Does it work on Mac OS X?

I haven't done a proper review, but you could change the contentType to 
"bits-per-second”. That is what we use for the Network Utilization event which 
reports statistics per interface.

Thanks
Erik
Hi All,

Could I please have a review and possibly some opinions on the following 
enhancement to JFR and the JDK? 

At SAP we have a per thread IO statistic among our supportability enhancements 
which proved to be very helpful for our support engineers. It might be 
beneficial for JFR as well and would certainly help us to drive adoption of 
OpenJDK.

The basic idea is simple, we have added fields to the thread class where the 
number of bytes read and written from/to file and network are counted in. The 
newly created JFR events are written periodically as for example the 
ThreadAllocationStatistics event already is.

In order to collect the data, we have added hooks to the JDK C coding calling 
back into the VM.

I have opened a bug here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8216981

Here is a webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ghaug/webrevs/8216981

There are no tests yet and the code be a bit nicer in places. We will work on 
this if/when this feature is deemed acceptable.

Finally, we have an API in our SAP version of the JDK to access this data from 
a Java application. This is used by many SAP applications and I think we could 
add an MXBean in a second step, to provide similar functionality.

Thanks in advance,
Gunter






Reply via email to