Hi David,

ok, as for the general need for a CSR.

There's some history here: When the initial change was made for that feature 
(delayed start of debugging, [0]), we missed going through the CSR process. 
After Alan had discovered this, Ralf created a CSR [1] to retroactively review 
this item. However, nothing happened on it yet on the review side. Now Ralf 
also has a (reviewed) code change regarding an additional jcmd to get the 
listen address of the debugger [2], [3]. And now there's also this item to 
update the required permission.

I'm wondering whether we should use the CSR 8223456 to discuss all of this 
context... Do you think that's appropriate?

Thanks
Christoph

[0] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214892 
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223456
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223065
[3] 
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2019-April/027833.html
  



> -----Original Message-----
> From: serviceability-dev <[email protected]> On
> Behalf Of David Holmes
> Sent: Samstag, 25. Mai 2019 01:06
> To: Schmelter, Ralf <[email protected]>; serviceability-
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: RFR (S) 8224673: Adjust permission for delayed starting of
> debugging
> 
> Hi Ralf,
> 
> This will need a CSR request to change the permission.
> 
> Thanks,
> David
> 
> On 24/05/2019 10:05 pm, Schmelter, Ralf wrote:
> > Please review this small change. It changes the permission needed to
> > delayed start the debugging (when enabled with onjcmd=y) via a
> > diagnostic mbean.
> >
> > webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rschmelter/webrevs/8224673/webrev.0/
> >
> > bugreport: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224673
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Ralf
> >

Reply via email to