Hi Jon,

It looks good to me as well (not an official reviewer though :-)),
Jc

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:09 PM <serguei.spit...@oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi Jon,
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 6/4/19 2:42 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> > Please review another small patch for the jdk.jdi module, to fix a
> > missing heading in one file and to adjust a heading in another.
> >
> > No webrev; patch below.
> >
> > That being said, the file
> > src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/com/sun/jdi/doc-files/signature.html barely
> > warrants being its own file, but even what content there is deserves
> > to be fixed. The table caption is oversized, the table has no borders
> > and not not use any CSS to "stripe" the rows. However, that cleanup is
> > out of scope for this accessibility fix for the headings.
> >
> > -- Jon
> >
> > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225309
> >
> >
> > $ hg diff -R open
> > diff -r 4158e6a864d4
> > src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/com/sun/jdi/doc-files/signature.html
> > --- a/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/com/sun/jdi/doc-files/signature.html
> > Tue Jun 04 13:47:59 2019 -0700
> > +++ b/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/com/sun/jdi/doc-files/signature.html
> > Tue Jun 04 14:35:34 2019 -0700
> > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> >  </HEAD>
> >  <BODY style="background-color:white">
> >  <div role="main">
> > +<h1>JDI Type Signatures</h1>
> >  <Table Border="0">
> >  <caption style="font-size:x-large"><b>JDI Type Signatures</b></caption>
> >  <thead>
> > diff -r 4158e6a864d4 src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java
> > --- a/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java Tue Jun 04 13:47:59
> > 2019 -0700
> > +++ b/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java Tue Jun 04 14:35:34
> > 2019 -0700
> > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
> >   * This module includes a simple command-line debugger,
> >   * <em>{@index jdb jdb tool}</em>.
> >   *
> > - * <h3>Global Exceptions</h3>
> > + * <h2>Global Exceptions</h2>
> >   * <p>
> >   * This section documents exceptions which apply to the entire API
> > and are thus
> >   * not documented on individual methods.
> >
>
>

-- 

Thanks,
Jc

Reply via email to