Hi Erik, adding Andrew and Aleksey.
> The new webrev looks good. Thanks. > Note though the following though... it looks like the AArch64 code > doesn't do appropriate fencing if the field is volatile. I agree. I was not aware of JDK-8179954 (https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179954). My new aarch64 proposal: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mdoerr/8227680_FastJNIAccessors/webrev.02/ Note: All platforms were tested except arm (32 bit). I could also return (address)-1 if JvmtiExport::can_post_field_access() in case nobody wants this for arm. Best regards, Martin
