Thanks Chris!
I'm waiting for Serguei's review.

Yasumasa


On 2019/08/14 7:47, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,

The changes look ok to me, although I've got to admit the language and library 
features used by toolMap are a bit beyond what I'm comfortable with (I'm one of 
those that find many uses of newer language and library feature to be more of a 
hindrance to understanding code than they are a benefit to simplifying or 
streamlining code). But I'm ok with it and assume it works as the reader would 
expect (after staring at it for a bit).

I likely won't be able to do any re-review if more changes are needed since 
I'll be out of the office for a while. I think Serguei is going to do the 2nd 
review, so assuming he's ok with it, and any additional changes are minor, you 
can still count me as a reviewer.

thanks,

Chris

On 8/10/19 4:14 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
PING: Could you review it?

   JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8226204
   webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8226204/webrev.00/


Yasumasa


On 2019/07/24 10:18, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi all,

Please review this change:

   JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8226204
   webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8226204/webrev.00/

This enhancement has been proposed in [1].

SALauncher (jhsdb implementation) processes the option for each subcommand 
(e.g. jstack, hsdb).
But they exist in many place with similar code.
So there is some room for refactoring.

This change has passed the tests on submit repo and serviceability/sa tests.


Thanks,

Yasumasa


[1] 
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2019-June/028376.html


Reply via email to