On 20/09/2019 9:33 am, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 9/19/19 4:06 PM, David Holmes wrote:
2. You implemented the new method in the test class.
I don't understand why you did that. The test can't be calling the new
method. Now that it is a default method we will get past the
compilation failure that caused the problem. So no change to the test
should be needed AFAICS.
Maybe. It can verify easily. I don't know what the test does and
whether it expects a good return value rather than UOE.
The test doesn't call it. It is a new method that the test knows nothing
about.
David
-----
Implementing the new method has no harm but as I commented early, it is
a long attribute and not an operation.
I'm okay with either way.
Mandy
