On 29/11/2019 06:29, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Hi Matthias,

I am not certain the callers are prepared to handle NULL.

This is used in a chain of TRANSFORM macro calls which AFAICS do not handle NULL; e.g. , at 872, we pass the returned pointer to convertUft8ToPlatformString which passes it on (on Windows) to MultiByteToWideChar, which does not handle NULL input.

So I wonder whether a clear error message with an exit would be better in this case. Otherwise we may get a crash just some instructions later.

Right, this needs a lot more analysis to see if it's even possible to continue. The main usage is VM startup where the -javaagent option specifies agents that have the Boot-Class-Path attribute. In that case it would not be unreasonable to abort the process, it's unlikely to get much startup in the startup if memory is exhausted. The other possible context is where a tool agent is loaded into a running VM, in which case have the attach thread return with a pending exception might be okay (although the VM is likely to shutdown anyway as the memory exhaustion will be detected/handled elsewhere).

-Alan

Reply via email to