Hi Igor and Vladimir,

the tests have passed on PPC64. Change is good. Thanks for checking with us.

Best regards,
Martin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Langer, Christoph <[email protected]>
> Sent: Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2019 12:24
> To: Igor Ignatyev <[email protected]>; Doerr, Martin
> <[email protected]>; Lindenmaier, Goetz
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: serviceability-dev <[email protected]>; Vladimir
> Kozlov <[email protected]>; hotspot-dev Source Developers
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: RFR(T) : 8235353 : clean up hotspot problem lists
> 
> Hi Igor,
> 
> I have added your update to our test system. I'll let you know the results by
> tomorrow.
> 
> Best regards
> Christoph
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: serviceability-dev <[email protected]>
> On
> > Behalf Of Igor Ignatyev
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2019 03:08
> > To: Doerr, Martin <[email protected]>; Lindenmaier, Goetz
> > <[email protected]>
> > Cc: serviceability-dev <[email protected]>; Vladimir
> > Kozlov <[email protected]>; hotspot-dev Source Developers
> > <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: RFR(T) : 8235353 : clean up hotspot problem lists
> >
> > Martin, Goetz.
> >
> > could you please check that these 9 tests still pass on PPC?
> >
> > -- Igor
> >
> > > On Dec 4, 2019, at 12:01 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
> <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I am fine with changes but we need to ask PPC64 supporter to verify that
> > tests passed now.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Vladimir K
> > >
> > > On 12/4/19 11:52 AM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
> > >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8235353/webrev.00
> > >>> 9 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 9 mod;
> > >> Hi all,
> > >> could you please review this small and trivial cleanup which returns
> > serviceablility/sa tests back to execution on linux-ppc64. the tests were
> > problem listed due to 8211767[1], which is closed as a dup of resolved
> > 8228649[2].
> > >> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211767
> > >> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8228649
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> -- Igor

Reply via email to