Hi all,

Updated according to your comments:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8238633/webrev.02/

I modified vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/heap/HeapWalkTests/TestDescription.java test [1] to walk 300K objects.

Without patch:
Time: 987431 nsecs
Time: 1135390 nsecs
Time: 1142519 nsecs
Time: 962816 nsecs
Time: 1015958 nsecs

Avg: 1048822 nsecs

With patch:
1105015 nsecs
1142425 nsecs
968057 nsecs
1383838 nsecs
1079885 nsecs

Avg: 1135844 nsecs

So, it shows about 8% performance hit.

Thanks,

-Zhengyu

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8238633/test/webrev.00/





On 2/21/20 8:01 AM, coleen.phillim...@oracle.com wrote:
Adding serviceability-dev back.
Coleen

On 2/21/20 7:59 AM, coleen.phillim...@oracle.com wrote:

Hi, I had a quick look at this, minus the shenandoah code.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8238633/webrev.01/src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/objectMarker.hpp.html

I think this file could have forward declarations of GrowableArray and I didn't see a need for the markWord.hpp include.

This change on the whole looks good to me.

Coleen

On 2/21/20 5:23 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
Hi Zhengyu,

On 2020-02-17 15:51, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
Hi Stefan,

Thanks for the review and suggestions, updated accordingly:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8238633/webrev.01/

Thanks for moving the code. I think this looks good.

If you're up for it, I have a couple of style change suggestions:

1) ObjectMarker uses two verbs to describe the same thing: "mark" and "visit". I propose that we only use "mark" in ObjectMarker and leave the usage of "visited" to the Jvmti code.

2) Some updates to odd whitespaces

3) Using forward declarations in Shenandoah code.

I've bundled those changes into webrevs:

https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8238633/webrev.01.delta
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8238633/webrev.01

Regarding performance testing, the HeapWalkTests you used seems to use a very small heap. I think it would be good to redo the measurements on a larger heap. Could you take the HeapWalkTest and add a few GBs of small, linked objects?

Thank,
StefanK


---
Previously, the calls to 'mark' and 'visited' were inlineable, but now every GC has to take a virtual call when marking the objects. My guess is that this code is slow anyway, and that it doesn't matter too much, but did you measure the effect of that change with, for example, G1?

I did rough measurement, timing vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/heap/HeapWalkTests/TestDescription.java test.

If you know any tests/benchmarks I should measure, please let me know.

Thanks,

-Zhengyu


Thanks,
StefanK

Test:
   hotspot_gc
   vmTestbase_nsk_jdi
   vmTestbase_nsk_jvmti

Thanks,

-Zhengyu








Reply via email to