Hi Daniil,

Besides what Chris is pointed out the fix looks good.

Minor:
  97         while(true) {
 113             if(mbeanCount * 2 == counterCount || retryCounter++ > MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPT) {
 114                 assertEquals(mbeanCount * 2, counterCount);
 Space is missed in while and if.
 I doubt, the assert is really needed.

  96         // is running ( e.g. Graal MBean). In this case just retry the test.
 Extra space before "e.g.".

Thanks,
Serguei


On 4/24/20 11:30, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Daniil,

  84             // If new MBean (e.g. Graal MBean) is registred while the test is running names1,
 106             // If new MBean (e.g. Graal MBean) is registred while the test is running mbeans1,

registred -> registered
',' after "running"

Just wondering how you chose 10 as the number of retries. Seems excessive. Shouldn't the problem turn up at most 1 time and therefore only 1 retry is needed.

  76         int counter = 0;
  86             if (sameSize(names1, names2, names3) || counter++ > MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS) {

The way the checks are done you will actually end up retrying MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS+1 times. For example, if MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS is 1, first time through the loop counter is 0 so a retry is allowed. Second time through the loop counter is 1, so a retry is allowed again.

thanks,

Chris

On 4/18/20 11:30 AM, Daniil Titov wrote:
Please review the change that fixes the failure of javax/management/generified/GenericTest.java  and
  javax/management/query/CustomQueryTest.java tests when Graal is on.

The tests checks that calls of management API are consistent and return the same set of MBeans.  However,
when Graal is on the Graal MBean might be registered between the calls that in turn makes the results
inconsistent and the tests fail.

The fix makes the test aware that some MBean might be registered while the checks run and if it happens the tests repeat the check.

Testing : Mach5 tests with Graal on and tier1-tier3 tests passed.

[1]  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8242239/webrev.01/
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242239

Thanks,
Daniil










Reply via email to