Hi Dan,
What's the criteria for "noise". I don't consider the failures for this
test as noisy. I only see 3 in mach5 CI testing for all of JDK 15. JDK
14 does appear to have been somewhat noisy, possibly enough so that it
looks like maybe something changed to reduce the number of failures in
15. In any case, do you plan on backporting to 14?
thanks,
Chris
On 6/12/20 9:46 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Greetings,
It's time to reduce the noise in the CI so I'm ProblemListing tests.
Here's the bug for failure:
JDK-8205957 setfldw001/TestDescription.java fails with bad field
value
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205957
and here's the bug for the ProblemListing:
JDK-8247495 ProblemList
vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/SetFieldAccessWatch/setfldw001/TestDescription.java
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8247495
I'm considering this a trivial change so I need a single (R)eviewer.
Here's the context diff for the change:
$ hg diff
diff -r 015533451f4c test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
--- a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt Fri Jun 12 09:31:08 2020
-0700
+++ b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt Fri Jun 12 12:40:17 2020
-0400
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@
vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI05/ji05t001/TestDescription.java
8219652 aix-ppc64
vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI06/ji06t001/TestDescription.java
8219652 aix-ppc64
vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/SetJNIFunctionTable/setjniftab001/TestDescription.java
8219652 aix-ppc64
+vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/SetFieldAccessWatch/setfldw001/TestDescription.java
8205957 generic-all
vmTestbase/gc/lock/jni/jnilock002/TestDescription.java
8208243,8192647 generic-all
This issue is actually much older than JDK-8205957 would indicate
(first sighting in JDK11 for that bug ID). The older version of
the test is covered by https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6528079
and that failures first sighting is in JDK7.
Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions, or suggestions.
Dan
