On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:15:31 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcu...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> Thanks @iignatev for providing the hint that helped finding the cause for 
>> the JVMTI_ERROR_INVALID_SLOT
>> 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252593?focusedCommentId=14368599&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14368599
>> 
>> I would like to take a different approach now for fixing this by making sure 
>> the JVMTI GetLocalObject() call refers to
>> one of the recursiveMethod frames on stack.
>> How to do that? Can I close this PR and create a new branch JDK-8252593-2 
>> and then a new PR?
>
> You can also change the PR back to draft, revamp the changes and then
> change the PR back to "ready for review" or whatever it's called.
> However, I don't know the preferred protocol for such things.

Thanks @dcubed-ojdk ! I didn't know the PR can be converted back to draft. I 
will try that.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/142

Reply via email to