On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:22:58 GMT, Robbin Ehn <r...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I don't understand, you'd have to rearrange the initializers in the >> constructor too, but I don't see any order >> dependance. Moving over _lock helps, so this is fine. > > You want a cosmetic change in the member declaration. > I'm saying the constructor will look worse. > > Im asking if you want to trade a worse constructor for that? > (all here is extremely subjective :) ) It is subjective. What you have is fine. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/151
