On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:54:06 GMT, Richard Reingruber <rr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Thanks, I'm exploring what we need to execute the EB inside the handshake. >> So far I think that really needs to go in a separate PR, since it becomes >> really unrelated to this.... picking up your change. >> >>> Hi Robbin, >>> >>> for merging master after integration of #119 I'd suggest to resolve the >>> conflicts by chosing the alternative from this pr and then apply >>> [reinrich@6fa91e3](https://github.com/reinrich/jdk/commit/6fa91e344ed5bf6d877e3f5a2d0d1920591fd441) >>> (is there a more elegant way to propose a patch?) >>> >>> I successfully tested >>> >>> ``` >>> make run-test TEST=test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/EATests.java >>> ``` >>> >>> which also covers PopFrame and ForceEarlyReturn. >>> >>> More tests are running. >>> >>> For night tests of our team it is unfortunately too late. >>> >>> Thanks, Richard. > >> Thanks, I'm exploring what we need to execute the EB inside the handshake. > > I want to experiment with object reallocation without referencing a frame. I > think a should be possible to reallocate objects given only the corresponding > compiled pc. If so, then a handshake/vm operation can fail with the request > to reallocate objects at a pc. This can be done concurrently and then the > handshake/vm operation can be restarted. I pushed the merge. (I manage to pick up bad state in first merge, so I did a second merge to get the fixes for that) Please have a look. Still running test, but there were some interest in this change-set (it seem to fix an unrelated bug also) so I published it. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/729
