On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 03:52:23 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> BTW, one thing to keep in mind that whatever we do with `dumpheap`, the jcmd > version will support fine control over parallelism. So for that reason it > wouldn't be so bad to just have `dumpheap` and `inspectheap` always use some > default parallelism, and allow tuning it with the jcmd versions. But since > the `inspectheap` parallel support already went into 16, that might be hard > to undo. Hi Chris, Lin, IMHO, 16 is not an LTS, maybe it's better for us to adjust the behavior of jmap -histo in 17 which is LTS? I just filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8261482. Thanks. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2261
